Enhance literature search and research lookup documentation

- Added criteria for identifying high-quality literature, emphasizing the importance of Tier-1 journals and citation counts.
- Updated guidelines for citation finding to prioritize influential papers and reputable authors.
- Revised abstract writing instructions to reflect the preference for flowing paragraphs over structured formats.
- Included best practices for generating AI schematics, specifically regarding figure numbering and content clarity.
This commit is contained in:
Vinayak Agarwal
2026-02-03 14:31:19 -08:00
parent 49024095e3
commit 21801d71b2
8 changed files with 897 additions and 117 deletions

View File

@@ -51,56 +51,84 @@ Attract readers and accurately represent the paper's content.
### Purpose
Provide a complete, standalone summary enabling readers to decide if the full paper is relevant to them.
### Structure
Most journals now require **structured abstracts** with labeled sections:
### Format: Flowing Paragraphs (Default)
**Background/Objective**: Why was the study needed? What was the aim?
- 1-2 sentences
- State the research problem and objective
**⚠️ CRITICAL: Write abstracts as flowing paragraphs, NOT with labeled sections.**
**Methods**: How was it done?
- 2-4 sentences
- Study design, participants, key procedures, analysis methods
Most scientific papers use **unstructured abstracts** written as one or two cohesive paragraphs. This is the standard format for the majority of journals including Nature, Science, Cell, PNAS, and most field-specific journals.
**Results**: What was found?
- 3-5 sentences
- Main findings with key statistics
- Present the most important numerical data
**WRONG - Structured abstract with labels:**
```
Background: Hospital-acquired infections remain a major cause of morbidity.
Methods: We conducted a 12-month before-after study...
Results: Post-intervention, surface contamination decreased by 47%...
Conclusions: UV-C disinfection significantly reduced infection rates.
```
**Conclusions**: What does it mean?
- 1-2 sentences
- Interpretation and implications
- Avoid overstating or adding new information
**CORRECT - Flowing paragraph style:**
```
Hospital-acquired infections remain a major cause of morbidity, yet optimal
disinfection strategies remain unclear. We conducted a 12-month before-after
study in a 500-bed teaching hospital to evaluate UV-C disinfection added to
standard cleaning protocols. Environmental surfaces were cultured monthly and
infection rates tracked via surveillance data. Post-intervention, surface
contamination decreased by 47% (95% CI: 38-56%, p<0.001), and catheter-associated
urinary tract infections declined from 3.2 to 1.8 per 1000 catheter-days (RR=0.56,
95% CI: 0.38-0.83, p=0.004). No adverse effects were observed. These findings
demonstrate that UV-C disinfection significantly reduces environmental contamination
and infection rates, suggesting it may be a valuable addition to hospital infection
control programs.
```
### Abstract Structure (as unified paragraph)
While written as flowing prose, the abstract should cover these elements in order:
1. **Context and problem** (1-2 sentences): Why the research matters, what gap exists
2. **Study description** (1-2 sentences): What was done and how (study design, methods)
3. **Key findings** (2-4 sentences): Main results with specific quantitative data
4. **Significance** (1-2 sentences): Interpretation, implications, and conclusions
### Length
- Typically 100-250 words (check journal requirements)
- Some journals allow up to 300 words
- Typically 150-300 words (check journal requirements)
- Some journals allow up to 350 words
### Key Rules
- Write the abstract **last** (after completing all other sections)
- **Write as flowing paragraph(s)** - no labeled sections
- Make it fully understandable without reading the paper
- Do not cite references in the abstract
- Avoid abbreviations or define them at first use
- Use past tense for methods and results, present tense for conclusions
- Include key quantitative results with statistical measures
- Use transitions to connect sentences naturally
### When to Use Structured Abstracts (Exception)
Only use labeled sections (Background/Objective, Methods, Results, Conclusions) when:
- The journal **explicitly requires** structured abstracts in their author guidelines
- Common in some medical journals (JAMA, BMJ, Annals of Internal Medicine)
- Always check journal requirements before formatting
Even for structured abstracts, write each section as complete sentences, not fragments.
### Example: Flowing Paragraph Abstract
### Example Structure
```
Background: Hospital-acquired infections remain a major cause of morbidity. This study
evaluated the effectiveness of a new disinfection protocol in reducing infection rates.
Methods: We conducted a 12-month before-after study in a 500-bed teaching hospital.
Environmental surfaces were cultured monthly, and infection rates were tracked via
surveillance data. The intervention involved UV-C disinfection added to standard cleaning.
Results: Post-intervention, surface contamination decreased by 47% (95% CI: 38-56%,
p<0.001), and catheter-associated urinary tract infections declined from 3.2 to 1.8
per 1000 catheter-days (RR=0.56, 95% CI: 0.38-0.83, p=0.004). No adverse effects were
observed.
Conclusions: UV-C disinfection significantly reduced environmental contamination and
infection rates. This intervention may be a valuable addition to hospital infection
control programs.
Transcriptomic aging clocks offer unique advantages for assessing biological age by
capturing dynamic cellular states and acute responses to perturbations. Using the
ARCHS4 database containing uniformly processed RNA-seq data from over 1.2 million
human samples, we developed deep neural network models to predict chronological age
from gene expression profiles. Our best-performing model achieved a mean absolute
error of 4.2 years (R² = 0.89) on held-out test data, substantially outperforming
traditional machine learning approaches including elastic net regression (MAE = 6.8
years) and random forests (MAE = 5.9 years). Feature importance analysis identified
genes enriched in senescence, inflammation, and mitochondrial function pathways as
the strongest predictors. Cross-tissue validation revealed that lung and blood
samples yielded the most accurate predictions, while liver showed the highest
variance. These findings establish deep learning as a powerful approach for
transcriptomic age prediction and identify candidate biomarkers for biological
aging assessment.
```
## Introduction