mirror of
https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-skills.git
synced 2026-03-27 07:09:27 +08:00
Enhance literature search and research lookup documentation
- Added criteria for identifying high-quality literature, emphasizing the importance of Tier-1 journals and citation counts. - Updated guidelines for citation finding to prioritize influential papers and reputable authors. - Revised abstract writing instructions to reflect the preference for flowing paragraphs over structured formats. - Included best practices for generating AI schematics, specifically regarding figure numbering and content clarity.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -51,56 +51,84 @@ Attract readers and accurately represent the paper's content.
|
||||
### Purpose
|
||||
Provide a complete, standalone summary enabling readers to decide if the full paper is relevant to them.
|
||||
|
||||
### Structure
|
||||
Most journals now require **structured abstracts** with labeled sections:
|
||||
### Format: Flowing Paragraphs (Default)
|
||||
|
||||
**Background/Objective**: Why was the study needed? What was the aim?
|
||||
- 1-2 sentences
|
||||
- State the research problem and objective
|
||||
**⚠️ CRITICAL: Write abstracts as flowing paragraphs, NOT with labeled sections.**
|
||||
|
||||
**Methods**: How was it done?
|
||||
- 2-4 sentences
|
||||
- Study design, participants, key procedures, analysis methods
|
||||
Most scientific papers use **unstructured abstracts** written as one or two cohesive paragraphs. This is the standard format for the majority of journals including Nature, Science, Cell, PNAS, and most field-specific journals.
|
||||
|
||||
**Results**: What was found?
|
||||
- 3-5 sentences
|
||||
- Main findings with key statistics
|
||||
- Present the most important numerical data
|
||||
❌ **WRONG - Structured abstract with labels:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
Background: Hospital-acquired infections remain a major cause of morbidity.
|
||||
Methods: We conducted a 12-month before-after study...
|
||||
Results: Post-intervention, surface contamination decreased by 47%...
|
||||
Conclusions: UV-C disinfection significantly reduced infection rates.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Conclusions**: What does it mean?
|
||||
- 1-2 sentences
|
||||
- Interpretation and implications
|
||||
- Avoid overstating or adding new information
|
||||
✅ **CORRECT - Flowing paragraph style:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
Hospital-acquired infections remain a major cause of morbidity, yet optimal
|
||||
disinfection strategies remain unclear. We conducted a 12-month before-after
|
||||
study in a 500-bed teaching hospital to evaluate UV-C disinfection added to
|
||||
standard cleaning protocols. Environmental surfaces were cultured monthly and
|
||||
infection rates tracked via surveillance data. Post-intervention, surface
|
||||
contamination decreased by 47% (95% CI: 38-56%, p<0.001), and catheter-associated
|
||||
urinary tract infections declined from 3.2 to 1.8 per 1000 catheter-days (RR=0.56,
|
||||
95% CI: 0.38-0.83, p=0.004). No adverse effects were observed. These findings
|
||||
demonstrate that UV-C disinfection significantly reduces environmental contamination
|
||||
and infection rates, suggesting it may be a valuable addition to hospital infection
|
||||
control programs.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Abstract Structure (as unified paragraph)
|
||||
|
||||
While written as flowing prose, the abstract should cover these elements in order:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Context and problem** (1-2 sentences): Why the research matters, what gap exists
|
||||
2. **Study description** (1-2 sentences): What was done and how (study design, methods)
|
||||
3. **Key findings** (2-4 sentences): Main results with specific quantitative data
|
||||
4. **Significance** (1-2 sentences): Interpretation, implications, and conclusions
|
||||
|
||||
### Length
|
||||
- Typically 100-250 words (check journal requirements)
|
||||
- Some journals allow up to 300 words
|
||||
- Typically 150-300 words (check journal requirements)
|
||||
- Some journals allow up to 350 words
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Rules
|
||||
- Write the abstract **last** (after completing all other sections)
|
||||
- **Write as flowing paragraph(s)** - no labeled sections
|
||||
- Make it fully understandable without reading the paper
|
||||
- Do not cite references in the abstract
|
||||
- Avoid abbreviations or define them at first use
|
||||
- Use past tense for methods and results, present tense for conclusions
|
||||
- Include key quantitative results with statistical measures
|
||||
- Use transitions to connect sentences naturally
|
||||
|
||||
### When to Use Structured Abstracts (Exception)
|
||||
|
||||
Only use labeled sections (Background/Objective, Methods, Results, Conclusions) when:
|
||||
- The journal **explicitly requires** structured abstracts in their author guidelines
|
||||
- Common in some medical journals (JAMA, BMJ, Annals of Internal Medicine)
|
||||
- Always check journal requirements before formatting
|
||||
|
||||
Even for structured abstracts, write each section as complete sentences, not fragments.
|
||||
|
||||
### Example: Flowing Paragraph Abstract
|
||||
|
||||
### Example Structure
|
||||
```
|
||||
Background: Hospital-acquired infections remain a major cause of morbidity. This study
|
||||
evaluated the effectiveness of a new disinfection protocol in reducing infection rates.
|
||||
|
||||
Methods: We conducted a 12-month before-after study in a 500-bed teaching hospital.
|
||||
Environmental surfaces were cultured monthly, and infection rates were tracked via
|
||||
surveillance data. The intervention involved UV-C disinfection added to standard cleaning.
|
||||
|
||||
Results: Post-intervention, surface contamination decreased by 47% (95% CI: 38-56%,
|
||||
p<0.001), and catheter-associated urinary tract infections declined from 3.2 to 1.8
|
||||
per 1000 catheter-days (RR=0.56, 95% CI: 0.38-0.83, p=0.004). No adverse effects were
|
||||
observed.
|
||||
|
||||
Conclusions: UV-C disinfection significantly reduced environmental contamination and
|
||||
infection rates. This intervention may be a valuable addition to hospital infection
|
||||
control programs.
|
||||
Transcriptomic aging clocks offer unique advantages for assessing biological age by
|
||||
capturing dynamic cellular states and acute responses to perturbations. Using the
|
||||
ARCHS4 database containing uniformly processed RNA-seq data from over 1.2 million
|
||||
human samples, we developed deep neural network models to predict chronological age
|
||||
from gene expression profiles. Our best-performing model achieved a mean absolute
|
||||
error of 4.2 years (R² = 0.89) on held-out test data, substantially outperforming
|
||||
traditional machine learning approaches including elastic net regression (MAE = 6.8
|
||||
years) and random forests (MAE = 5.9 years). Feature importance analysis identified
|
||||
genes enriched in senescence, inflammation, and mitochondrial function pathways as
|
||||
the strongest predictors. Cross-tissue validation revealed that lung and blood
|
||||
samples yielded the most accurate predictions, while liver showed the highest
|
||||
variance. These findings establish deep learning as a powerful approach for
|
||||
transcriptomic age prediction and identify candidate biomarkers for biological
|
||||
aging assessment.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user