Enhance citation management and literature review guidelines

- Updated SKILL.md in citation management to include best practices for identifying seminal and high-impact papers, emphasizing citation count thresholds, venue quality tiers, and author reputation indicators.
- Expanded literature review SKILL.md to prioritize high-impact papers, detailing citation metrics, journal tiers, and author reputation assessment.
- Added comprehensive evaluation strategies for paper impact and quality in literature_search_strategies.md, including citation count significance and journal impact factor guidance.
- Improved research lookup scripts to prioritize results based on citation count, venue prestige, and author reputation, enhancing the quality of research outputs.
This commit is contained in:
Vinayak Agarwal
2026-01-05 13:01:10 -08:00
parent d243a12564
commit 3439a21f57
41 changed files with 11802 additions and 61 deletions

View File

@@ -274,12 +274,95 @@ Use WebSearch for:
- If studying plant-microbe symbiosis: search `nitrogen fixation rhizobia legumes`
- If studying drug resistance: search `antibiotic resistance evolution mechanisms`
## Evaluating Paper Impact and Quality
### Citation Count Significance
Citation counts indicate influence and importance in the field. Interpret citations relative to paper age and field norms:
| Paper Age | Citations | Interpretation |
|-----------|-----------|----------------|
| 0-3 years | 20+ | Noteworthy - gaining traction |
| 0-3 years | 100+ | Highly Influential - significant impact already |
| 3-7 years | 100+ | Significant - established contribution |
| 3-7 years | 500+ | Landmark - major contribution to field |
| 7+ years | 500+ | Seminal - widely recognized important work |
| 7+ years | 1000+ | Foundational - field-defining paper |
**Field-specific considerations:**
- Biomedical/clinical: Higher citation norms (NEJM papers often 1000+)
- Computer Science: Conference citations matter more than journals
- Mathematics/Physics: Lower citation norms, longer citation half-lives
- Social Sciences: Moderate citation norms, high book citation rates
### Journal Impact Factor Guidance
**Tier 1 - Premier Venues (Always Prefer):**
- **General Science:** Nature (IF ~65), Science (IF ~55), Cell (IF ~65), PNAS (IF ~12)
- **Medicine:** NEJM (IF ~175), Lancet (IF ~170), JAMA (IF ~120), BMJ (IF ~93)
- **Field Flagships:** Nature Medicine, Nature Biotechnology, Nature Methods, Nature Genetics
**Tier 2 - High-Impact Specialized (Strong Preference):**
- Impact Factor >10
- Examples: JAMA Internal Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, Circulation, Blood
- Top ML/AI conferences: NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR (equivalent to IF 15-25)
**Tier 3 - Respected Specialized (Include When Relevant):**
- Impact Factor 5-10
- Established society journals
- Well-indexed specialty journals
**Tier 4 - Other Peer-Reviewed (Use Sparingly):**
- Impact Factor <5
- Only cite if directly relevant AND no better source exists
### Author Track Record Evaluation
Prefer papers from established researchers:
**Strong Author Indicators:**
- **High h-index:** >40 in established fields, >20 for early-career stars
- **Multiple Tier-1 publications:** Track record in Nature/Science/Cell family
- **Institutional affiliation:** Leading research universities and institutes
- **Recognition:** Awards, fellowships, editorial positions
- **First/last authorship:** On multiple highly-cited papers
**How to Check Author Reputation:**
1. Google Scholar profile: Check h-index, i10-index, total citations
2. PubMed: Search author name, review publication venues
3. Institutional page: Check position, awards, grants
4. ORCID profile: Full publication history
### Conference Ranking Awareness (Computer Science/AI)
For ML/AI and computer science topics, conference rankings matter:
**A* (Flagship) - Equivalent to Nature/Science:**
- NeurIPS (Neural Information Processing Systems)
- ICML (International Conference on Machine Learning)
- ICLR (International Conference on Learning Representations)
- CVPR (Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)
- ACL (Association for Computational Linguistics)
**A (Excellent) - Equivalent to Tier-2 Journals:**
- AAAI, IJCAI (AI general)
- EMNLP, NAACL (NLP)
- ECCV, ICCV (Computer Vision)
- SIGKDD, WWW (Data Mining)
**B (Good) - Equivalent to Tier-3 Journals:**
- COLING, CoNLL (NLP)
- WACV, BMVC (Computer Vision)
- Most ACM/IEEE specialized conferences
## Evaluating Source Quality
### Primary Research Quality Indicators
**Strong quality signals:**
- Published in reputable journals
- Published in Tier-1 or Tier-2 venues
- High citation count for paper age
- Written by established researchers with strong track records
- Large sample sizes (for statistical power)
- Pre-registered studies (reduces bias)
- Appropriate controls and methods