feat(research-grants): Add comprehensive Taiwan NSTC proposal support

- Add new nstc_guidelines.md with official requirements and practical insights
- Include CM03 format specifications and page limits by field
- Integrate LaTeX templates (CTAN package, Overleaf templates)
- Add practical writing strategies from three expert reviewers:
  * Prof. Huang You-Ping (NPU): Scoring thresholds and section strategies
  * Prof. Guo Yao-Huang: Closed-loop logic and KPI formulation
  * President Wei Yao-Hui (Mackay): SMART principles and review dimensions
- Include budget preparation guidance and common pitfalls
- Update SKILL.md to reference NSTC in overview and agency list

This comprehensive guide provides 700+ lines of actionable guidance for
Taiwan NSTC (formerly MOST/NSC) research proposal writing.

scientific-skills/research-grants/SKILL.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: research-grants
-description: "Write competitive research proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, and DARPA. Agency-specific formatting, review criteria, budget preparation, broader impacts, significance statements, innovation narratives, and compliance with submission requirements."
+description: "Write competitive research proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and Taiwan NSTC. Agency-specific formatting, review criteria, budget preparation, broader impacts, significance statements, innovation narratives, and compliance with submission requirements."
 allowed-tools: [Read, Write, Edit, Bash]
 license: MIT license
 metadata:
@@ -11,14 +11,14 @@ metadata:
 
 ## Overview
 
-Research grant writing is the process of developing competitive funding proposals for federal agencies and foundations. Master agency-specific requirements, review criteria, narrative structure, budget preparation, and compliance for NSF (National Science Foundation), NIH (National Institutes of Health), DOE (Department of Energy), and DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) submissions.
+Research grant writing is the process of developing competitive funding proposals for federal agencies and foundations. Master agency-specific requirements, review criteria, narrative structure, budget preparation, and compliance for NSF (National Science Foundation), NIH (National Institutes of Health), DOE (Department of Energy), DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), and Taiwan's NSTC (National Science and Technology Council) submissions.
 
 **Critical Principle: Grants are persuasive documents that must simultaneously demonstrate scientific rigor, innovation, feasibility, and broader impact.** Each agency has distinct priorities, review criteria, formatting requirements, and strategic goals that must be addressed.
 
 ## When to Use This Skill
 
 This skill should be used when:
-- Writing research proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, or DARPA programs
+- Writing research proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, or NSTC programs
 - Preparing project descriptions, specific aims, or technical narratives
 - Developing broader impacts or significance statements
 - Creating research timelines and milestone plans
@@ -114,6 +114,16 @@ For detailed guidance on creating schematics, refer to the scientific-schematics
 - Teaming and collaboration often required
 - Varies dramatically by program manager and BAA (Broad Agency Announcement)
 
+### NSTC (National Science and Technology Council - Taiwan)
+**Mission**: Advance scientific breakthrough, industrial application, and societal impact in Taiwan.
+
+**Key Features**:
+- **CM03 Form**: The core technical proposal format.
+- **Bilingual**: Abstract required in both Chinese and English.
+- **Innovation & Feasibility**: Primary review focus.
+- **Preliminary Data**: Highly critical for credibility.
+- **Research Architecture Diagram**: A mandatory visual element for clarity.
+
 ## Core Components of Research Proposals
 
 ### 1. Executive Summary / Project Summary / Abstract
@@ -195,6 +205,7 @@ For detailed agency-specific guidance, refer to:
 - `references/nih_guidelines.md`
 - `references/doe_guidelines.md`
 - `references/darpa_guidelines.md`
+- `references/nstc_guidelines.md`
 
 ### 3. Specific Aims (NIH) or Objectives (NSF/DOE/DARPA)
 
@@ -582,12 +593,17 @@ Varies by program office, but generally includes:
 **DARPA-specific considerations**:
 - Overall scientific and technical merit
 - Potential contribution to DARPA mission
-- Relevance to stated program goals
-- Plans and capability to accomplish technology transition
-- Qualifications and experience of proposed team
 - Realism of proposed costs and availability of funds
 
-**Key Questions DARPA Asks**:
+### NSTC Review Criteria
+
+**Core Evaluation Dimensions**:
+1. **Innovation (創新性)**: Novelty of concept and approach.
+2. **Feasibility (可行性)**: Methodology rigor and preliminary data.
+3. **PI Capability (主持人能力)**: Track record and expertise.
+4. **Value (價值)**: Academic contribution and societal/industrial impact.
+
+For detailed review criteria by agency, refer to `references/review_criteria.md` and `references/nstc_guidelines.md`.
 - **What if you succeed?** (Impact if the research works)
 - **What if you're right?** (Implications of your hypothesis)
 - **Who cares?** (Why it matters for national security)