feat: add cognitive science skills — consciousness-council, dhdna-profiler, what-if-oracle

Three research-backed cognitive science skills:

- consciousness-council: 12-archetype Mind Council deliberation for structured multi-perspective analysis
- dhdna-profiler: cognitive fingerprinting across 12 dimensions (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18736629)
- what-if-oracle: multi-branch scenario analysis with probability weighting (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18736841)

Each includes reference documentation. All MIT licensed.
Source: https://github.com/ashrafkahoush-ux/Claude-consciousness-skills

scientific-skills/what-if-oracle/references/scenario-templates.md

@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+# What-If Oracle — Scenario Templates
+
+Reference guide for domain-specific scenario analysis configurations.
+
+## Startup / Business Decision
+
+**Variables to test:**
+
+- Market entry timing
+- Pricing strategy
+- Partnership terms
+- Hiring decisions
+- Funding rounds
+
+**Branch emphasis:** Likely Case + Contrarian + Second Order
+**Key tension:** Speed vs. thoroughness — startups can't afford to analyze forever
+
+**Template prompt:**
+
+> "What if we [specific action] in [timeframe]? Our current state: [revenue, team size, runway]. Key constraint: [the limiting factor]."
+
+## Technology Architecture
+
+**Variables to test:**
+
+- Tech stack choice
+- Build vs. buy
+- Scaling approach
+- Security model
+- Migration path
+
+**Branch emphasis:** Worst Case + Wild Card + Second Order
+**Key tension:** Engineering elegance vs. shipping speed
+
+**Template prompt:**
+
+> "What if we choose [technology/approach] for [system]? Current architecture: [brief description]. Team capability: [relevant skills]. Timeline: [deadline]."
+
+## Investment / Financial
+
+**Variables to test:**
+
+- Market conditions
+- Valuation scenarios
+- Exit timing
+- Capital allocation
+- Revenue model changes
+
+**Branch emphasis:** All 6 branches — money decisions deserve full analysis
+**Key tension:** Risk tolerance vs. opportunity cost
+
+**Template prompt:**
+
+> "What if [market condition / financial event] happens? Our exposure: [amount/percentage]. Current position: [financial state]. Time horizon: [investment period]."
+
+## Career / Personal
+
+**Variables to test:**
+
+- Job change
+- Skill development path
+- Relocation
+- Relationship decisions
+- Health changes
+
+**Branch emphasis:** Likely Case + Best Case + Contrarian
+**Key tension:** Security vs. growth — comfort zone vs. expansion
+
+**Template prompt:**
+
+> "What if I [personal decision]? My current situation: [brief]. What I value most: [1-3 values]. What I'm afraid of: [honest answer]."
+
+## Geopolitical / Macro
+
+**Variables to test:**
+
+- Policy changes
+- Regulatory shifts
+- Market disruptions
+- Technology breakthroughs
+- Social movements
+
+**Branch emphasis:** Wild Card + Second Order + Contrarian
+**Key tension:** Local impact vs. systemic effects
+
+**Template prompt:**
+
+> "What if [geopolitical event] happens? My exposure: [how it affects me/my organization]. Time horizon: [relevant period]."
+
+## Crisis Response
+
+**Variables to test:**
+
+- Severity escalation
+- Communication strategy
+- Resource allocation
+- Recovery timeline
+- Reputation impact
+
+**Branch emphasis:** Worst Case (detailed) + Likely Case + Second Order
+**Key tension:** Immediate triage vs. root cause resolution
+
+**Template prompt:**
+
+> "We're facing [crisis/incident]. Current impact: [what's broken]. Stakeholders affected: [who]. Resources available: [what we can deploy]. What if [specific escalation scenario]?"
+
+## The Recursive Template
+
+For complex, multi-layered analysis:
+
+```
+ROUND 1: "What if X?"
+  → Identify the most likely branch (α)
+
+ROUND 2: "Given α is happening, what if Y?"
+  → Identify the most likely sub-branch
+
+ROUND 3: "Given α+Y, what if Z?"
+  → Map the deepest consequences
+
+Each round narrows the possibility space while deepening understanding.
+Maximum recommended depth: 3 rounds.
+```
+
+## Probability Calibration Guide
+
+When assigning probabilities to branches:
+
+| Confidence Level | Probability Range | Evidence Required                                          |
+| ---------------- | ----------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- |
+| **Very High**    | >80%              | Strong historical precedent + current data alignment       |
+| **High**         | 60-80%            | Multiple converging signals, some historical support       |
+| **Medium**       | 30-60%            | Mixed signals, could go either way                         |
+| **Low**          | 10-30%            | Plausible but requires several things to go a specific way |
+| **Very Low**     | <10%              | Black swan territory — possible but unlikely               |
+
+**Rule:** All branch probabilities in a single analysis should sum to approximately 100%. If they don't, there's a missing branch.