skills/claude-scientific-skills
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-skills.git synced 2026-03-27 07:09:27 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update SKILL.md files to add double quotation marks for all skills, ensuring clarity and consistency across all entries.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Haoxuan "Orion" Li
2025-10-20 20:51:50 -07:00
parent c0fa308af8
commit c2b16829f6
68 changed files with 68 additions and 68 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
scientific-thinking/scientific-critical-thinking/SKILL.md
View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
---
name: scientific-critical-thinking
description: Apply systematic scientific critical thinking to rigorously evaluate research methodology, statistical analyses, evidence quality, and scientific claims. Use this skill when: analyzing research papers for methodological flaws and biases; evaluating experimental designs for validity threats; assessing statistical methods, power, multiple comparisons, and effect sizes; identifying logical fallacies and cognitive biases in scientific arguments; reviewing evidence hierarchies and GRADE criteria; critiquing causal claims vs correlational findings; evaluating study quality using established frameworks (Cochrane ROB, Newcastle-Ottawa); detecting publication bias, p-hacking, and selective reporting; assessing confounding, selection bias, and measurement validity; reviewing research proposals and study protocols; evaluating media reports of scientific findings; conducting systematic literature reviews; determining confidence levels in scientific conclusions; distinguishing between exploratory and confirmatory findings; and providing constructive methodological feedback for improving research rigor.
description: "Apply systematic scientific critical thinking to rigorously evaluate research methodology, statistical analyses, evidence quality, and scientific claims. Use this skill when: analyzing research papers for methodological flaws and biases; evaluating experimental designs for validity threats; assessing statistical methods, power, multiple comparisons, and effect sizes; identifying logical fallacies and cognitive biases in scientific arguments; reviewing evidence hierarchies and GRADE criteria; critiquing causal claims vs correlational findings; evaluating study quality using established frameworks (Cochrane ROB, Newcastle-Ottawa); detecting publication bias, p-hacking, and selective reporting; assessing confounding, selection bias, and measurement validity; reviewing research proposals and study protocols; evaluating media reports of scientific findings; conducting systematic literature reviews; determining confidence levels in scientific conclusions; distinguishing between exploratory and confirmatory findings; and providing constructive methodological feedback for improving research rigor."
---
# Scientific Critical Thinking