# Professional Report Formatting for Scientific Documents This reference guide covers professional formatting for scientific reports, technical documents, and white papers. Use the `scientific_report.sty` LaTeX style package for consistent, professional output. --- ## When to Use Professional Report Formatting ### Use This Style For: - **Research reports** - Internal and external research summaries - **Technical reports** - Detailed technical documentation and analyses - **White papers** - Position papers and thought leadership documents - **Grant reports** - Progress reports and final grant reports - **Policy briefs** - Research-informed policy recommendations - **Industry reports** - Technical reports for industry audiences - **Internal research summaries** - Team and stakeholder communications - **Feasibility studies** - Technical and research feasibility assessments - **Project documentation** - Research project deliverables ### Do NOT Use This Style For: - **Journal manuscripts** → Use `venue-templates` skill for journal-specific formatting - **Conference papers** → Use `venue-templates` skill for conference requirements - **Academic theses/dissertations** → Use institutional templates - **Peer-reviewed submissions** → Follow journal author guidelines **Key Distinction**: Professional report formatting prioritizes visual appeal and readability for general audiences, while journal manuscripts must follow strict publisher requirements. --- ## Overview of scientific_report.sty The `scientific_report.sty` package provides: | Feature | Description | |---------|-------------| | Typography | Helvetica font family for modern, professional appearance | | Color Scheme | Coordinated blues, greens, oranges, and purples | | Box Environments | Colored boxes for organizing content types | | Tables | Professional styling with alternating rows | | Figures | Consistent caption formatting | | Headers/Footers | Professional page headers and footers | | Scientific Commands | Shortcuts for p-values, effect sizes, statistics | ### Basic Document Setup ```latex \documentclass[11pt,letterpaper]{report} \usepackage{scientific_report} \begin{document} % Your content here \end{document} ``` **Compilation**: Use XeLaTeX or LuaLaTeX for proper Helvetica font rendering: ```bash xelatex document.tex ``` --- ## Box Environments for Content Organization ### Purpose and Usage Colored boxes help readers quickly identify different types of content. Use them strategically to highlight important information. ### Available Box Environments | Environment | Color | Purpose | |-------------|-------|---------| | `keyfindings` | Blue | Major findings, discoveries, key takeaways | | `methodology` | Green | Methods, procedures, study design | | `resultsbox` | Blue-green | Statistical results, data highlights | | `recommendations` | Purple | Recommendations, action items, implications | | `limitations` | Orange | Limitations, cautions, caveats | | `criticalnotice` | Red | Critical warnings, safety notices | | `definition` | Gray | Definitions, notes, supplementary info | | `executivesummary` | Blue (shadow) | Executive summaries | | `hypothesis` | Light blue | Research hypotheses | ### Key Findings Box Use for major findings and important discoveries: ```latex \begin{keyfindings}[Research Highlights] Our analysis revealed three significant findings: \begin{enumerate} \item Treatment A was 40% more effective than control (\pvalue{0.001}) \item Effect sizes were clinically meaningful (\effectsize{d}{0.82}) \item Benefits persisted at 12-month follow-up \end{enumerate} \end{keyfindings} ``` **Best Practices:** - Use sparingly (1-3 per chapter maximum) - Reserve for genuinely important findings - Include specific numbers and statistics - Write concisely ### Methodology Box Use for highlighting methods and procedures: ```latex \begin{methodology}[Study Design] This double-blind, randomized controlled trial employed a 2×2 factorial design. Participants (\samplesize{450}) were randomized to one of four conditions: (1) Treatment A, (2) Treatment B, (3) Combined A+B, or (4) Placebo control. \end{methodology} ``` **Best Practices:** - Summarize key methodological features - Use at the start of methods sections - Include sample size and design type - Keep technical but accessible ### Results Box Use for highlighting specific statistical results: ```latex \begin{resultsbox}[Primary Outcome Analysis] Mixed-effects regression revealed a significant treatment × time interaction, \effectsize{F(3, 446)}{8.72}, \psig{< 0.001}, $\eta^2_p$ = 0.055, indicating differential improvement across treatment conditions over the study period. \end{resultsbox} ``` **Best Practices:** - Report complete statistical information - Use scientific notation commands - Include effect sizes alongside p-values - One box per major analysis ### Recommendations Box Use for recommendations and implications: ```latex \begin{recommendations}[Clinical Practice Guidelines] Based on our findings, we recommend: \begin{enumerate} \item \textbf{Primary recommendation:} Implement screening protocol for high-risk populations. \item \textbf{Secondary recommendation:} Adjust treatment intensity based on baseline severity scores. \item \textbf{Monitoring:} Reassess at 3-month intervals. \end{enumerate} \end{recommendations} ``` **Best Practices:** - Make recommendations specific and actionable - Prioritize with clear labels - Link to supporting evidence - Include implementation guidance ### Limitations Box Use for limitations, caveats, and cautions: ```latex \begin{limitations}[Study Limitations] Several limitations should be considered: \begin{itemize} \item \textbf{Sample:} Participants were recruited from academic medical centers, limiting generalizability to community settings. \item \textbf{Design:} The observational design precludes causal inference about treatment effects. \item \textbf{Attrition:} 15% dropout rate may introduce bias. \end{itemize} \end{limitations} ``` **Best Practices:** - Be honest and thorough - Explain implications of each limitation - Suggest how future research could address limitations - Don't over-qualify findings ### Critical Notice Box Use for critical warnings or safety information: ```latex \begin{criticalnotice}[Safety Warning] \textbf{Contraindication:} This intervention is contraindicated for patients with [condition]. Monitor for [adverse effects] and discontinue immediately if [symptoms] occur. Report serious adverse events to [contact]. \end{criticalnotice} ``` **Best Practices:** - Reserve for genuinely critical information - Be clear and direct - Include specific actions to take - Provide contact information if relevant ### Definition Box Use for definitions and explanatory notes: ```latex \begin{definition}[Effect Size] An \textbf{effect size} is a quantitative measure of the magnitude of a phenomenon. Unlike significance tests, effect sizes are independent of sample size and allow comparison across studies. Common measures include Cohen's \textit{d} for mean differences and Pearson's \textit{r} for correlations. \end{definition} ``` **Best Practices:** - Define technical terms at first use - Keep definitions concise - Include practical interpretation guidance - Use for audience-appropriate terms --- ## Professional Table Formatting ### Design Principles 1. **Clean appearance**: Use `booktabs` rules (`\toprule`, `\midrule`, `\bottomrule`) 2. **Alternating rows**: Apply `\rowcolor{tablealt}` to every other row 3. **Clear headers**: Bold headers for column identification 4. **Appropriate precision**: Report statistics to appropriate decimal places 5. **Complete information**: Include sample sizes, units, and notes ### Standard Data Table ```latex \begin{table}[htbp] \centering \caption{Demographic Characteristics by Treatment Group} \label{tab:demographics} \begin{tabular}{@{}lcc@{}} \toprule \textbf{Characteristic} & \textbf{Treatment} & \textbf{Control} \\ & (\samplesize{225}) & (\samplesize{225}) \\ \midrule Age, years, \meansd{M}{SD} & \meansd{42.3}{12.5} & \meansd{43.1}{11.8} \\ \rowcolor{tablealt} Female, n (\%) & 128 (56.9) & 121 (53.8) \\ Education, years, \meansd{M}{SD} & \meansd{14.2}{2.8} & \meansd{14.5}{2.6} \\ \rowcolor{tablealt} Baseline score, \meansd{M}{SD} & \meansd{52.4}{15.3} & \meansd{51.8}{14.9} \\ \bottomrule \end{tabular} \figurenote{No significant differences between groups at baseline (all \textit{p} > .10).} \end{table} ``` ### Results Table with Significance Indicators ```latex \begin{table}[htbp] \centering \caption{Treatment Effects on Primary and Secondary Outcomes} \label{tab:results} \begin{tabular}{@{}lcccc@{}} \toprule \textbf{Outcome} & \textbf{Treatment} & \textbf{Control} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{p} \\ & \meansd{M}{SD} & \meansd{M}{SD} & \textbf{(d)} & \\ \midrule Primary outcome & \meansd{68.4}{14.2} & \meansd{54.1}{15.8} & 0.95\sigthree & <.001 \\ \rowcolor{tablealt} Secondary A & \meansd{4.2}{1.1} & \meansd{3.5}{1.2} & 0.61\sigtwo & .003 \\ Secondary B & \meansd{22.8}{5.4} & \meansd{21.2}{5.1} & 0.31\sigone & .042 \\ \rowcolor{tablealt} Secondary C & \meansd{8.9}{2.3} & \meansd{8.5}{2.4} & 0.17\signs & .285 \\ \bottomrule \end{tabular} \vspace{0.5em} {\small \siglegend} \end{table} ``` ### Comparison Table with Quality Ratings ```latex \begin{table}[htbp] \centering \caption{Evidence Summary by Study} \label{tab:evidence} \begin{tabular}{@{}llccc@{}} \toprule \textbf{Study} & \textbf{Design} & \textbf{N} & \textbf{Quality} & \textbf{Evidence} \\ \midrule Smith et al. (2024) & RCT & 450 & \qualityhigh & \evidencestrong \\ \rowcolor{tablealt} Jones et al. (2023) & Cohort & 1,250 & \qualitymedium & \evidencemoderate \\ Chen et al. (2023) & Case-control & 320 & \qualitymedium & \evidencemoderate \\ \rowcolor{tablealt} Lee et al. (2022) & Cross-sectional & 890 & \qualitylow & \evidenceweak \\ \bottomrule \end{tabular} \end{table} ``` --- ## Figure and Caption Styling ### Caption Formatting The style package automatically formats captions with: - Blue, bold figure labels - Gray descriptive text - Centered alignment with margins ### Standard Figure ```latex \begin{figure}[htbp] \centering \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{../figures/results_comparison.png} \caption{Comparison of Outcome Scores by Treatment Condition and Time Point} \label{fig:results} \end{figure} ``` ### Figure with Source Attribution ```latex \begin{figure}[htbp] \centering \includegraphics[width=0.85\textwidth]{../figures/trend_analysis.png} \caption{Trends in Key Metrics Over the Study Period} \figuresource{Study data collected January--December 2024} \label{fig:trends} \end{figure} ``` ### Figure with Explanatory Note ```latex \begin{figure}[htbp] \centering \includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{../figures/conceptual_model.png} \caption{Conceptual Model of Hypothesized Relationships} \figurenote{Solid arrows indicate primary pathways; dashed arrows indicate moderated relationships. Numbers represent standardized coefficients.} \label{fig:model} \end{figure} ``` --- ## Color Palette and Visual Hierarchy ### Color Usage Guidelines | Color | Use For | Avoid Using For | |-------|---------|-----------------| | Primary Blue | Headers, important findings | Warnings, cautions | | Science Green | Methods, positive results | Negative findings | | Orange | Cautions, limitations | Positive findings | | Red | Critical warnings | Routine content | | Purple | Recommendations | Findings, methods | | Gray | Definitions, notes | Key findings | ### Visual Hierarchy 1. **Executive summary boxes** (shadow effect) - Most prominent 2. **Colored content boxes** - High prominence for key content 3. **Tables with color** - Medium prominence for data 4. **Body text** - Standard prominence 5. **Definition boxes** - Lower prominence for supplementary info ### Accessibility Considerations - Color palette is designed to be distinguishable for common color vision deficiencies - All boxes have both color AND structural indicators (borders, backgrounds) - Text maintains sufficient contrast ratios - Don't rely solely on color to convey meaning --- ## Typography Guidelines ### Font Specifications | Element | Font | Size | Color | |---------|------|------|-------| | Body text | Helvetica | 11pt | Dark gray (#424242) | | Chapter titles | Helvetica Bold | Huge | Primary blue (#003366) | | Section headings | Helvetica Bold | Large | Primary blue (#003366) | | Subsections | Helvetica Bold | large | Secondary blue (#4A90E2) | | Subsubsections | Helvetica Bold | normalsize | Dark gray (#424242) | ### Spacing - Line spacing: 1.15 (for readability) - Paragraph spacing: 0.5em between paragraphs - Page margins: 1 inch on all sides ### Best Typography Practices 1. **Consistency**: Use the same formatting for similar elements 2. **Hierarchy**: Use visual weight to indicate importance 3. **Readability**: Adequate spacing and contrast 4. **Professionalism**: Avoid mixing fonts or excessive formatting --- ## Scientific Notation Commands Reference ### Statistical Reporting | Command | Output | When to Use | |---------|--------|-------------| | `\pvalue{0.023}` | *p* = 0.023 | Report p-values | | `\psig{< 0.001}` | ***p*** = < 0.001 | Significant p-values (bold) | | `\CI{0.45}{0.72}` | 95% CI [0.45, 0.72] | Confidence intervals | | `\effectsize{d}{0.75}` | d = 0.75 | Effect sizes | | `\samplesize{250}` | *n* = 250 | Sample sizes | | `\meansd{42.5}{8.3}` | 42.5 ± 8.3 | Mean with SD | ### Significance Indicators | Command | Output | Meaning | |---------|--------|---------| | `\sigone` | * | p < 0.05 | | `\sigtwo` | ** | p < 0.01 | | `\sigthree` | *** | p < 0.001 | | `\signs` | ns | not significant | | `\siglegend` | Full legend | For table footnotes | ### Quality and Evidence Ratings | Command | Output | Meaning | |---------|--------|---------| | `\qualityhigh` | **HIGH** (green) | High quality | | `\qualitymedium` | **MEDIUM** (orange) | Moderate quality | | `\qualitylow` | **LOW** (red) | Low quality | | `\evidencestrong` | **Strong** (green) | Strong evidence | | `\evidencemoderate` | **Moderate** (orange) | Moderate evidence | | `\evidenceweak` | **Weak** (red) | Weak evidence | ### Trend Indicators | Command | Symbol | Meaning | |---------|--------|---------| | `\trendup` | ▲ (green) | Increasing trend | | `\trenddown` | ▼ (red) | Decreasing trend | | `\trendflat` | → (gray) | Stable/no change | --- ## Complete LaTeX Examples ### Executive Summary Example ```latex \chapter*{Executive Summary} \addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{Executive Summary} \begin{executivesummary}[Report Highlights] This report presents findings from a comprehensive study of [topic] involving \samplesize{450} participants across 12 research sites. The research addressed [key question] using [methodology]. \end{executivesummary} \subsection*{Key Findings} \begin{keyfindings} \begin{enumerate} \item The primary intervention demonstrated a large effect (\effectsize{d}{0.82}, \psig{< 0.001}). \item Benefits were maintained at 12-month follow-up. \item Cost-effectiveness analysis supports implementation. \end{enumerate} \end{keyfindings} \subsection*{Recommendations} \begin{recommendations} Based on these findings, we recommend: \begin{enumerate} \item Implement the intervention in [settings]. \item Train practitioners using the standardized protocol. \item Monitor outcomes using the validated measures. \end{enumerate} \end{recommendations} ``` ### Methods Section Example ```latex \chapter{Methods} \begin{methodology}[Study Overview] This randomized controlled trial employed a parallel-group design with 1:1 allocation to intervention or control conditions. The study was conducted across 12 sites between January 2023 and December 2024. \end{methodology} \section{Participants} A total of \samplesize{450} participants were enrolled. Eligibility criteria were: \begin{itemize} \item Age 18--65 years \item Diagnosis of [condition] per [criteria] \item No contraindications to [intervention] \end{itemize} Table~\ref{tab:participants} presents participant characteristics. \begin{limitations}[Recruitment Challenges] Recruitment was slower than anticipated due to [reasons]. The final sample was 10% below target, which may affect statistical power for secondary analyses. \end{limitations} ``` ### Results Section Example ```latex \chapter{Results} \section{Primary Outcome} \begin{resultsbox}[Primary Analysis] Mixed-effects regression revealed a significant treatment effect, \effectsize{F(1, 448)}{42.18}, \psig{< 0.001}, with a large effect size (\effectsize{d}{0.82}). The treatment group showed significantly greater improvement (\meansd{16.4}{5.2} points) compared to control (\meansd{8.1}{4.8} points). \end{resultsbox} Figure~\ref{fig:primary} illustrates the treatment effects over time. \begin{figure}[htbp] \centering \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{../figures/primary_outcome.png} \caption{Primary Outcome Scores by Treatment Group and Time Point} \figurenote{Error bars represent 95\% confidence intervals.} \label{fig:primary} \end{figure} \section{Secondary Outcomes} Results for secondary outcomes are presented in Table~\ref{tab:secondary}. ``` ### Discussion Section Example ```latex \chapter{Discussion} \section{Summary of Findings} \begin{keyfindings}[Main Conclusions] \begin{enumerate} \item The intervention was highly effective (primary hypothesis \highlight{supported}) \item Effects were clinically meaningful and durable \item Evidence strength: \evidencestrong \end{enumerate} \end{keyfindings} \section{Limitations} \begin{limitations} Several limitations warrant consideration: \begin{itemize} \item The sample was predominantly [demographic], limiting generalizability. \item Attrition was higher in the control group (18\% vs. 12\%). \item Self-report measures may be subject to response bias. \end{itemize} \end{limitations} \section{Implications} \begin{recommendations}[Research Implications] \begin{enumerate} \item Replicate in diverse populations \item Investigate mechanisms of change \item Test implementation strategies \end{enumerate} \end{recommendations} \begin{recommendations}[Practice Implications] \begin{enumerate} \item Adopt the intervention in [settings] \item Train providers using standardized protocols \item Monitor fidelity and outcomes \end{enumerate} \end{recommendations} ``` --- ## Checklist: Professional Report Quality Before finalizing your report, verify: ### Formatting - [ ] Using `scientific_report.sty` package - [ ] Compiled with XeLaTeX or LuaLaTeX - [ ] Helvetica font rendering correctly - [ ] Colors displaying properly ### Content Organization - [ ] Executive summary present and complete - [ ] Key findings highlighted in boxes - [ ] Methods clearly described - [ ] Results properly formatted with statistics - [ ] Limitations acknowledged - [ ] Recommendations are specific and actionable ### Tables - [ ] All tables have captions and labels - [ ] Alternating row colors applied - [ ] Significance indicators explained - [ ] Numbers formatted consistently ### Figures - [ ] All figures have captions and labels - [ ] Sources attributed where appropriate - [ ] Resolution sufficient for printing (300 DPI) - [ ] Referenced in text ### Statistical Reporting - [ ] P-values reported appropriately - [ ] Effect sizes included - [ ] Confidence intervals where relevant - [ ] Sample sizes stated ### Professional Appearance - [ ] Consistent formatting throughout - [ ] No orphaned headers or widows - [ ] Page breaks at appropriate locations - [ ] References complete and formatted --- ## Resources ### Files in This Skill - `assets/scientific_report.sty` - The LaTeX style package - `assets/scientific_report_template.tex` - Complete report template - `assets/REPORT_FORMATTING_GUIDE.md` - Quick reference guide ### Related Skills - `venue-templates` - For journal manuscripts and conference papers - `scientific-schematics` - For generating diagrams and figures - `generate-image` - For creating illustrations and graphics ### External Resources - [LaTeX Wikibook](https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/LaTeX) - General LaTeX reference - [Booktabs Package Documentation](https://ctan.org/pkg/booktabs) - Professional table styling - [tcolorbox Package Documentation](https://ctan.org/pkg/tcolorbox) - Colored box environments