665 lines
20 KiB
Markdown
665 lines
20 KiB
Markdown
# Professional Report Formatting for Scientific Documents
|
||
|
||
This reference guide covers professional formatting for scientific reports, technical documents, and white papers. Use the `scientific_report.sty` LaTeX style package for consistent, professional output.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## When to Use Professional Report Formatting
|
||
|
||
### Use This Style For:
|
||
|
||
- **Research reports** - Internal and external research summaries
|
||
- **Technical reports** - Detailed technical documentation and analyses
|
||
- **White papers** - Position papers and thought leadership documents
|
||
- **Grant reports** - Progress reports and final grant reports
|
||
- **Policy briefs** - Research-informed policy recommendations
|
||
- **Industry reports** - Technical reports for industry audiences
|
||
- **Internal research summaries** - Team and stakeholder communications
|
||
- **Feasibility studies** - Technical and research feasibility assessments
|
||
- **Project documentation** - Research project deliverables
|
||
|
||
### Do NOT Use This Style For:
|
||
|
||
- **Journal manuscripts** → Use `venue-templates` skill for journal-specific formatting
|
||
- **Conference papers** → Use `venue-templates` skill for conference requirements
|
||
- **Academic theses/dissertations** → Use institutional templates
|
||
- **Peer-reviewed submissions** → Follow journal author guidelines
|
||
|
||
**Key Distinction**: Professional report formatting prioritizes visual appeal and readability for general audiences, while journal manuscripts must follow strict publisher requirements.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Overview of scientific_report.sty
|
||
|
||
The `scientific_report.sty` package provides:
|
||
|
||
| Feature | Description |
|
||
|---------|-------------|
|
||
| Typography | Helvetica font family for modern, professional appearance |
|
||
| Color Scheme | Coordinated blues, greens, oranges, and purples |
|
||
| Box Environments | Colored boxes for organizing content types |
|
||
| Tables | Professional styling with alternating rows |
|
||
| Figures | Consistent caption formatting |
|
||
| Headers/Footers | Professional page headers and footers |
|
||
| Scientific Commands | Shortcuts for p-values, effect sizes, statistics |
|
||
|
||
### Basic Document Setup
|
||
|
||
```latex
|
||
\documentclass[11pt,letterpaper]{report}
|
||
\usepackage{scientific_report}
|
||
|
||
\begin{document}
|
||
% Your content here
|
||
\end{document}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Compilation**: Use XeLaTeX or LuaLaTeX for proper Helvetica font rendering:
|
||
```bash
|
||
xelatex document.tex
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Box Environments for Content Organization
|
||
|
||
### Purpose and Usage
|
||
|
||
Colored boxes help readers quickly identify different types of content. Use them strategically to highlight important information.
|
||
|
||
### Available Box Environments
|
||
|
||
| Environment | Color | Purpose |
|
||
|-------------|-------|---------|
|
||
| `keyfindings` | Blue | Major findings, discoveries, key takeaways |
|
||
| `methodology` | Green | Methods, procedures, study design |
|
||
| `resultsbox` | Blue-green | Statistical results, data highlights |
|
||
| `recommendations` | Purple | Recommendations, action items, implications |
|
||
| `limitations` | Orange | Limitations, cautions, caveats |
|
||
| `criticalnotice` | Red | Critical warnings, safety notices |
|
||
| `definition` | Gray | Definitions, notes, supplementary info |
|
||
| `executivesummary` | Blue (shadow) | Executive summaries |
|
||
| `hypothesis` | Light blue | Research hypotheses |
|
||
|
||
### Key Findings Box
|
||
|
||
Use for major findings and important discoveries:
|
||
|
||
```latex
|
||
\begin{keyfindings}[Research Highlights]
|
||
Our analysis revealed three significant findings:
|
||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||
\item Treatment A was 40% more effective than control (\pvalue{0.001})
|
||
\item Effect sizes were clinically meaningful (\effectsize{d}{0.82})
|
||
\item Benefits persisted at 12-month follow-up
|
||
\end{enumerate}
|
||
\end{keyfindings}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Best Practices:**
|
||
- Use sparingly (1-3 per chapter maximum)
|
||
- Reserve for genuinely important findings
|
||
- Include specific numbers and statistics
|
||
- Write concisely
|
||
|
||
### Methodology Box
|
||
|
||
Use for highlighting methods and procedures:
|
||
|
||
```latex
|
||
\begin{methodology}[Study Design]
|
||
This double-blind, randomized controlled trial employed a 2×2 factorial
|
||
design. Participants (\samplesize{450}) were randomized to one of four
|
||
conditions: (1) Treatment A, (2) Treatment B, (3) Combined A+B, or
|
||
(4) Placebo control.
|
||
\end{methodology}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Best Practices:**
|
||
- Summarize key methodological features
|
||
- Use at the start of methods sections
|
||
- Include sample size and design type
|
||
- Keep technical but accessible
|
||
|
||
### Results Box
|
||
|
||
Use for highlighting specific statistical results:
|
||
|
||
```latex
|
||
\begin{resultsbox}[Primary Outcome Analysis]
|
||
Mixed-effects regression revealed a significant treatment × time
|
||
interaction, \effectsize{F(3, 446)}{8.72}, \psig{< 0.001},
|
||
$\eta^2_p$ = 0.055, indicating differential improvement across
|
||
treatment conditions over the study period.
|
||
\end{resultsbox}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Best Practices:**
|
||
- Report complete statistical information
|
||
- Use scientific notation commands
|
||
- Include effect sizes alongside p-values
|
||
- One box per major analysis
|
||
|
||
### Recommendations Box
|
||
|
||
Use for recommendations and implications:
|
||
|
||
```latex
|
||
\begin{recommendations}[Clinical Practice Guidelines]
|
||
Based on our findings, we recommend:
|
||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||
\item \textbf{Primary recommendation:} Implement screening protocol
|
||
for high-risk populations.
|
||
\item \textbf{Secondary recommendation:} Adjust treatment intensity
|
||
based on baseline severity scores.
|
||
\item \textbf{Monitoring:} Reassess at 3-month intervals.
|
||
\end{enumerate}
|
||
\end{recommendations}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Best Practices:**
|
||
- Make recommendations specific and actionable
|
||
- Prioritize with clear labels
|
||
- Link to supporting evidence
|
||
- Include implementation guidance
|
||
|
||
### Limitations Box
|
||
|
||
Use for limitations, caveats, and cautions:
|
||
|
||
```latex
|
||
\begin{limitations}[Study Limitations]
|
||
Several limitations should be considered:
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
\item \textbf{Sample:} Participants were recruited from academic
|
||
medical centers, limiting generalizability to community settings.
|
||
\item \textbf{Design:} The observational design precludes causal
|
||
inference about treatment effects.
|
||
\item \textbf{Attrition:} 15% dropout rate may introduce bias.
|
||
\end{itemize}
|
||
\end{limitations}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Best Practices:**
|
||
- Be honest and thorough
|
||
- Explain implications of each limitation
|
||
- Suggest how future research could address limitations
|
||
- Don't over-qualify findings
|
||
|
||
### Critical Notice Box
|
||
|
||
Use for critical warnings or safety information:
|
||
|
||
```latex
|
||
\begin{criticalnotice}[Safety Warning]
|
||
\textbf{Contraindication:} This intervention is contraindicated for
|
||
patients with [condition]. Monitor for [adverse effects] and discontinue
|
||
immediately if [symptoms] occur. Report serious adverse events to [contact].
|
||
\end{criticalnotice}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Best Practices:**
|
||
- Reserve for genuinely critical information
|
||
- Be clear and direct
|
||
- Include specific actions to take
|
||
- Provide contact information if relevant
|
||
|
||
### Definition Box
|
||
|
||
Use for definitions and explanatory notes:
|
||
|
||
```latex
|
||
\begin{definition}[Effect Size]
|
||
An \textbf{effect size} is a quantitative measure of the magnitude of a
|
||
phenomenon. Unlike significance tests, effect sizes are independent of
|
||
sample size and allow comparison across studies. Common measures include
|
||
Cohen's \textit{d} for mean differences and Pearson's \textit{r} for
|
||
correlations.
|
||
\end{definition}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Best Practices:**
|
||
- Define technical terms at first use
|
||
- Keep definitions concise
|
||
- Include practical interpretation guidance
|
||
- Use for audience-appropriate terms
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Professional Table Formatting
|
||
|
||
### Design Principles
|
||
|
||
1. **Clean appearance**: Use `booktabs` rules (`\toprule`, `\midrule`, `\bottomrule`)
|
||
2. **Alternating rows**: Apply `\rowcolor{tablealt}` to every other row
|
||
3. **Clear headers**: Bold headers for column identification
|
||
4. **Appropriate precision**: Report statistics to appropriate decimal places
|
||
5. **Complete information**: Include sample sizes, units, and notes
|
||
|
||
### Standard Data Table
|
||
|
||
```latex
|
||
\begin{table}[htbp]
|
||
\centering
|
||
\caption{Demographic Characteristics by Treatment Group}
|
||
\label{tab:demographics}
|
||
\begin{tabular}{@{}lcc@{}}
|
||
\toprule
|
||
\textbf{Characteristic} & \textbf{Treatment} & \textbf{Control} \\
|
||
& (\samplesize{225}) & (\samplesize{225}) \\
|
||
\midrule
|
||
Age, years, \meansd{M}{SD} & \meansd{42.3}{12.5} & \meansd{43.1}{11.8} \\
|
||
\rowcolor{tablealt} Female, n (\%) & 128 (56.9) & 121 (53.8) \\
|
||
Education, years, \meansd{M}{SD} & \meansd{14.2}{2.8} & \meansd{14.5}{2.6} \\
|
||
\rowcolor{tablealt} Baseline score, \meansd{M}{SD} & \meansd{52.4}{15.3} & \meansd{51.8}{14.9} \\
|
||
\bottomrule
|
||
\end{tabular}
|
||
\figurenote{No significant differences between groups at baseline (all \textit{p} > .10).}
|
||
\end{table}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Results Table with Significance Indicators
|
||
|
||
```latex
|
||
\begin{table}[htbp]
|
||
\centering
|
||
\caption{Treatment Effects on Primary and Secondary Outcomes}
|
||
\label{tab:results}
|
||
\begin{tabular}{@{}lcccc@{}}
|
||
\toprule
|
||
\textbf{Outcome} & \textbf{Treatment} & \textbf{Control} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{p} \\
|
||
& \meansd{M}{SD} & \meansd{M}{SD} & \textbf{(d)} & \\
|
||
\midrule
|
||
Primary outcome & \meansd{68.4}{14.2} & \meansd{54.1}{15.8} & 0.95\sigthree & <.001 \\
|
||
\rowcolor{tablealt} Secondary A & \meansd{4.2}{1.1} & \meansd{3.5}{1.2} & 0.61\sigtwo & .003 \\
|
||
Secondary B & \meansd{22.8}{5.4} & \meansd{21.2}{5.1} & 0.31\sigone & .042 \\
|
||
\rowcolor{tablealt} Secondary C & \meansd{8.9}{2.3} & \meansd{8.5}{2.4} & 0.17\signs & .285 \\
|
||
\bottomrule
|
||
\end{tabular}
|
||
|
||
\vspace{0.5em}
|
||
{\small \siglegend}
|
||
\end{table}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Comparison Table with Quality Ratings
|
||
|
||
```latex
|
||
\begin{table}[htbp]
|
||
\centering
|
||
\caption{Evidence Summary by Study}
|
||
\label{tab:evidence}
|
||
\begin{tabular}{@{}llccc@{}}
|
||
\toprule
|
||
\textbf{Study} & \textbf{Design} & \textbf{N} & \textbf{Quality} & \textbf{Evidence} \\
|
||
\midrule
|
||
Smith et al. (2024) & RCT & 450 & \qualityhigh & \evidencestrong \\
|
||
\rowcolor{tablealt} Jones et al. (2023) & Cohort & 1,250 & \qualitymedium & \evidencemoderate \\
|
||
Chen et al. (2023) & Case-control & 320 & \qualitymedium & \evidencemoderate \\
|
||
\rowcolor{tablealt} Lee et al. (2022) & Cross-sectional & 890 & \qualitylow & \evidenceweak \\
|
||
\bottomrule
|
||
\end{tabular}
|
||
\end{table}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Figure and Caption Styling
|
||
|
||
### Caption Formatting
|
||
|
||
The style package automatically formats captions with:
|
||
- Blue, bold figure labels
|
||
- Gray descriptive text
|
||
- Centered alignment with margins
|
||
|
||
### Standard Figure
|
||
|
||
```latex
|
||
\begin{figure}[htbp]
|
||
\centering
|
||
\includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{../figures/results_comparison.png}
|
||
\caption{Comparison of Outcome Scores by Treatment Condition and Time Point}
|
||
\label{fig:results}
|
||
\end{figure}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Figure with Source Attribution
|
||
|
||
```latex
|
||
\begin{figure}[htbp]
|
||
\centering
|
||
\includegraphics[width=0.85\textwidth]{../figures/trend_analysis.png}
|
||
\caption{Trends in Key Metrics Over the Study Period}
|
||
\figuresource{Study data collected January--December 2024}
|
||
\label{fig:trends}
|
||
\end{figure}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Figure with Explanatory Note
|
||
|
||
```latex
|
||
\begin{figure}[htbp]
|
||
\centering
|
||
\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{../figures/conceptual_model.png}
|
||
\caption{Conceptual Model of Hypothesized Relationships}
|
||
\figurenote{Solid arrows indicate primary pathways; dashed arrows indicate moderated relationships. Numbers represent standardized coefficients.}
|
||
\label{fig:model}
|
||
\end{figure}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Color Palette and Visual Hierarchy
|
||
|
||
### Color Usage Guidelines
|
||
|
||
| Color | Use For | Avoid Using For |
|
||
|-------|---------|-----------------|
|
||
| Primary Blue | Headers, important findings | Warnings, cautions |
|
||
| Science Green | Methods, positive results | Negative findings |
|
||
| Orange | Cautions, limitations | Positive findings |
|
||
| Red | Critical warnings | Routine content |
|
||
| Purple | Recommendations | Findings, methods |
|
||
| Gray | Definitions, notes | Key findings |
|
||
|
||
### Visual Hierarchy
|
||
|
||
1. **Executive summary boxes** (shadow effect) - Most prominent
|
||
2. **Colored content boxes** - High prominence for key content
|
||
3. **Tables with color** - Medium prominence for data
|
||
4. **Body text** - Standard prominence
|
||
5. **Definition boxes** - Lower prominence for supplementary info
|
||
|
||
### Accessibility Considerations
|
||
|
||
- Color palette is designed to be distinguishable for common color vision deficiencies
|
||
- All boxes have both color AND structural indicators (borders, backgrounds)
|
||
- Text maintains sufficient contrast ratios
|
||
- Don't rely solely on color to convey meaning
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Typography Guidelines
|
||
|
||
### Font Specifications
|
||
|
||
| Element | Font | Size | Color |
|
||
|---------|------|------|-------|
|
||
| Body text | Helvetica | 11pt | Dark gray (#424242) |
|
||
| Chapter titles | Helvetica Bold | Huge | Primary blue (#003366) |
|
||
| Section headings | Helvetica Bold | Large | Primary blue (#003366) |
|
||
| Subsections | Helvetica Bold | large | Secondary blue (#4A90E2) |
|
||
| Subsubsections | Helvetica Bold | normalsize | Dark gray (#424242) |
|
||
|
||
### Spacing
|
||
|
||
- Line spacing: 1.15 (for readability)
|
||
- Paragraph spacing: 0.5em between paragraphs
|
||
- Page margins: 1 inch on all sides
|
||
|
||
### Best Typography Practices
|
||
|
||
1. **Consistency**: Use the same formatting for similar elements
|
||
2. **Hierarchy**: Use visual weight to indicate importance
|
||
3. **Readability**: Adequate spacing and contrast
|
||
4. **Professionalism**: Avoid mixing fonts or excessive formatting
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Scientific Notation Commands Reference
|
||
|
||
### Statistical Reporting
|
||
|
||
| Command | Output | When to Use |
|
||
|---------|--------|-------------|
|
||
| `\pvalue{0.023}` | *p* = 0.023 | Report p-values |
|
||
| `\psig{< 0.001}` | ***p*** = < 0.001 | Significant p-values (bold) |
|
||
| `\CI{0.45}{0.72}` | 95% CI [0.45, 0.72] | Confidence intervals |
|
||
| `\effectsize{d}{0.75}` | d = 0.75 | Effect sizes |
|
||
| `\samplesize{250}` | *n* = 250 | Sample sizes |
|
||
| `\meansd{42.5}{8.3}` | 42.5 ± 8.3 | Mean with SD |
|
||
|
||
### Significance Indicators
|
||
|
||
| Command | Output | Meaning |
|
||
|---------|--------|---------|
|
||
| `\sigone` | * | p < 0.05 |
|
||
| `\sigtwo` | ** | p < 0.01 |
|
||
| `\sigthree` | *** | p < 0.001 |
|
||
| `\signs` | ns | not significant |
|
||
| `\siglegend` | Full legend | For table footnotes |
|
||
|
||
### Quality and Evidence Ratings
|
||
|
||
| Command | Output | Meaning |
|
||
|---------|--------|---------|
|
||
| `\qualityhigh` | **HIGH** (green) | High quality |
|
||
| `\qualitymedium` | **MEDIUM** (orange) | Moderate quality |
|
||
| `\qualitylow` | **LOW** (red) | Low quality |
|
||
| `\evidencestrong` | **Strong** (green) | Strong evidence |
|
||
| `\evidencemoderate` | **Moderate** (orange) | Moderate evidence |
|
||
| `\evidenceweak` | **Weak** (red) | Weak evidence |
|
||
|
||
### Trend Indicators
|
||
|
||
| Command | Symbol | Meaning |
|
||
|---------|--------|---------|
|
||
| `\trendup` | ▲ (green) | Increasing trend |
|
||
| `\trenddown` | ▼ (red) | Decreasing trend |
|
||
| `\trendflat` | → (gray) | Stable/no change |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Complete LaTeX Examples
|
||
|
||
### Executive Summary Example
|
||
|
||
```latex
|
||
\chapter*{Executive Summary}
|
||
\addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{Executive Summary}
|
||
|
||
\begin{executivesummary}[Report Highlights]
|
||
This report presents findings from a comprehensive study of [topic]
|
||
involving \samplesize{450} participants across 12 research sites.
|
||
The research addressed [key question] using [methodology].
|
||
\end{executivesummary}
|
||
|
||
\subsection*{Key Findings}
|
||
|
||
\begin{keyfindings}
|
||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||
\item The primary intervention demonstrated a large effect
|
||
(\effectsize{d}{0.82}, \psig{< 0.001}).
|
||
\item Benefits were maintained at 12-month follow-up.
|
||
\item Cost-effectiveness analysis supports implementation.
|
||
\end{enumerate}
|
||
\end{keyfindings}
|
||
|
||
\subsection*{Recommendations}
|
||
|
||
\begin{recommendations}
|
||
Based on these findings, we recommend:
|
||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||
\item Implement the intervention in [settings].
|
||
\item Train practitioners using the standardized protocol.
|
||
\item Monitor outcomes using the validated measures.
|
||
\end{enumerate}
|
||
\end{recommendations}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Methods Section Example
|
||
|
||
```latex
|
||
\chapter{Methods}
|
||
|
||
\begin{methodology}[Study Overview]
|
||
This randomized controlled trial employed a parallel-group design with
|
||
1:1 allocation to intervention or control conditions. The study was
|
||
conducted across 12 sites between January 2023 and December 2024.
|
||
\end{methodology}
|
||
|
||
\section{Participants}
|
||
|
||
A total of \samplesize{450} participants were enrolled. Eligibility
|
||
criteria were:
|
||
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
\item Age 18--65 years
|
||
\item Diagnosis of [condition] per [criteria]
|
||
\item No contraindications to [intervention]
|
||
\end{itemize}
|
||
|
||
Table~\ref{tab:participants} presents participant characteristics.
|
||
|
||
\begin{limitations}[Recruitment Challenges]
|
||
Recruitment was slower than anticipated due to [reasons]. The final
|
||
sample was 10% below target, which may affect statistical power for
|
||
secondary analyses.
|
||
\end{limitations}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Results Section Example
|
||
|
||
```latex
|
||
\chapter{Results}
|
||
|
||
\section{Primary Outcome}
|
||
|
||
\begin{resultsbox}[Primary Analysis]
|
||
Mixed-effects regression revealed a significant treatment effect,
|
||
\effectsize{F(1, 448)}{42.18}, \psig{< 0.001}, with a large effect
|
||
size (\effectsize{d}{0.82}). The treatment group showed significantly
|
||
greater improvement (\meansd{16.4}{5.2} points) compared to control
|
||
(\meansd{8.1}{4.8} points).
|
||
\end{resultsbox}
|
||
|
||
Figure~\ref{fig:primary} illustrates the treatment effects over time.
|
||
|
||
\begin{figure}[htbp]
|
||
\centering
|
||
\includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{../figures/primary_outcome.png}
|
||
\caption{Primary Outcome Scores by Treatment Group and Time Point}
|
||
\figurenote{Error bars represent 95\% confidence intervals.}
|
||
\label{fig:primary}
|
||
\end{figure}
|
||
|
||
\section{Secondary Outcomes}
|
||
|
||
Results for secondary outcomes are presented in Table~\ref{tab:secondary}.
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Discussion Section Example
|
||
|
||
```latex
|
||
\chapter{Discussion}
|
||
|
||
\section{Summary of Findings}
|
||
|
||
\begin{keyfindings}[Main Conclusions]
|
||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||
\item The intervention was highly effective (primary hypothesis
|
||
\highlight{supported})
|
||
\item Effects were clinically meaningful and durable
|
||
\item Evidence strength: \evidencestrong
|
||
\end{enumerate}
|
||
\end{keyfindings}
|
||
|
||
\section{Limitations}
|
||
|
||
\begin{limitations}
|
||
Several limitations warrant consideration:
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
\item The sample was predominantly [demographic], limiting
|
||
generalizability.
|
||
\item Attrition was higher in the control group (18\% vs. 12\%).
|
||
\item Self-report measures may be subject to response bias.
|
||
\end{itemize}
|
||
\end{limitations}
|
||
|
||
\section{Implications}
|
||
|
||
\begin{recommendations}[Research Implications]
|
||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||
\item Replicate in diverse populations
|
||
\item Investigate mechanisms of change
|
||
\item Test implementation strategies
|
||
\end{enumerate}
|
||
\end{recommendations}
|
||
|
||
\begin{recommendations}[Practice Implications]
|
||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||
\item Adopt the intervention in [settings]
|
||
\item Train providers using standardized protocols
|
||
\item Monitor fidelity and outcomes
|
||
\end{enumerate}
|
||
\end{recommendations}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Checklist: Professional Report Quality
|
||
|
||
Before finalizing your report, verify:
|
||
|
||
### Formatting
|
||
- [ ] Using `scientific_report.sty` package
|
||
- [ ] Compiled with XeLaTeX or LuaLaTeX
|
||
- [ ] Helvetica font rendering correctly
|
||
- [ ] Colors displaying properly
|
||
|
||
### Content Organization
|
||
- [ ] Executive summary present and complete
|
||
- [ ] Key findings highlighted in boxes
|
||
- [ ] Methods clearly described
|
||
- [ ] Results properly formatted with statistics
|
||
- [ ] Limitations acknowledged
|
||
- [ ] Recommendations are specific and actionable
|
||
|
||
### Tables
|
||
- [ ] All tables have captions and labels
|
||
- [ ] Alternating row colors applied
|
||
- [ ] Significance indicators explained
|
||
- [ ] Numbers formatted consistently
|
||
|
||
### Figures
|
||
- [ ] All figures have captions and labels
|
||
- [ ] Sources attributed where appropriate
|
||
- [ ] Resolution sufficient for printing (300 DPI)
|
||
- [ ] Referenced in text
|
||
|
||
### Statistical Reporting
|
||
- [ ] P-values reported appropriately
|
||
- [ ] Effect sizes included
|
||
- [ ] Confidence intervals where relevant
|
||
- [ ] Sample sizes stated
|
||
|
||
### Professional Appearance
|
||
- [ ] Consistent formatting throughout
|
||
- [ ] No orphaned headers or widows
|
||
- [ ] Page breaks at appropriate locations
|
||
- [ ] References complete and formatted
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Resources
|
||
|
||
### Files in This Skill
|
||
|
||
- `assets/scientific_report.sty` - The LaTeX style package
|
||
- `assets/scientific_report_template.tex` - Complete report template
|
||
- `assets/REPORT_FORMATTING_GUIDE.md` - Quick reference guide
|
||
|
||
### Related Skills
|
||
|
||
- `venue-templates` - For journal manuscripts and conference papers
|
||
- `scientific-schematics` - For generating diagrams and figures
|
||
- `generate-image` - For creating illustrations and graphics
|
||
|
||
### External Resources
|
||
|
||
- [LaTeX Wikibook](https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/LaTeX) - General LaTeX reference
|
||
- [Booktabs Package Documentation](https://ctan.org/pkg/booktabs) - Professional table styling
|
||
- [tcolorbox Package Documentation](https://ctan.org/pkg/tcolorbox) - Colored box environments
|
||
|